Skip to content

Research Methodology — Glossary

TermMeaning
AbstractA short summary of a paper: background, methods, results, and conclusion
AnonymityParticipant identity is never linked to the data
AppraisalCritical evaluation of the quality of a source (used in reviewing)
AssumptionA condition required for a statistical method to hold
AttritionLoss of participants during a study (can cause attrition bias)
Audit trailA complete record of how data were handled, for verification
Bayes' theoremFormula to update a probability given new evidence
Bayesian inferenceUpdating prior beliefs with data to obtain a posterior
BeneficenceEthical duty to maximise benefits and minimise harms
BiasSystematic error that distorts study results
BlindingConcealing group allocation from participants, staff, or analysts
CRediT taxonomyStandard contributor roles (conceptualisation, methodology, etc.)
Cohort studyFollows a group over time to see who develops an outcome
CollinearityNear-linear dependence among predictor variables (multicollinearity)
ComparatorThe control or alternative treatment against which a test is measured
CompletenessProportion of expected data that is actually present
ComprehensivenessThoroughness of a search; how few studies are missed
Confidence intervalA range that, with stated confidence, contains the true parameter
ConfounderA variable causally linked to both exposure and outcome
Construct validityWhether a measure captures the theoretical construct intended
Content validityWhether an instrument samples the full domain of interest
Convenience samplingNon-probability sampling of easy-to-reach participants
CorrelationStrength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables
Cross-over trialEach participant receives multiple treatments in random order
Cross-sectional studyMeasures exposure and outcome at a single point in time
Data cleaningChecking and correcting data errors/inconsistencies before analysis
Data dredgingTesting many hypotheses on the same data (inflates false positives)
Data imputationFilling in missing values with estimated values
Data saturationPoint in qualitative work where no new themes emerge
Descriptive studyA study describing characteristics of a population
Descriptive statisticsSummaries of data (counts, mean, SD, etc.)
Degrees of freedomThe number of independent pieces of information in a statistic
DichotomousA variable taking only two possible values (yes/no)
Discrete variableA numeric variable taking countable values
DistributionThe set of values a variable can take and how often
Dummy variableA 0/1 variable encoding a category in a regression
Effect sizeThe magnitude of a difference or relationship (not just p-values)
Effect modificationA variable whose effect on the outcome differs by level
Eligibility criteriaRules defining who may participate in a study
EmpiricalBased on observation or experiment rather than pure theory
Ethics committeeIRB/REC body reviewing protocol and participant protections
EthnographyQualitative study of culture through fieldwork and observation
EvaluationAssessing the value, merit, or performance of something
Evidence-basedDecisions supported by the best available evidence
Experimental studyA study that assigns a treatment to infer causation
External validityWhether findings generalise beyond the study conditions
F-distributionThe probability distribution used for variance-ratio statistics
False discovery rateExpected proportion of false positives among significant results
FAIR dataData that is Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable
Family-wise error rateProbability of at least one Type I error across many tests
Fishbone diagramAn Ishikawa cause-and-effect diagram for root-cause analysis
Five whysAn iterative root-cause method of asking "why?" repeatedly
G*PowerSoftware for statistical power and sample-size analysis
Gap (literature)What is not yet known, which the current study addresses
Grounded theoryA qualitative method building theory directly from data
Grey literatureUnpublished/non-commercial works (reports, theses, preprints)
H0The null hypothesis (no effect or no difference)
H1The alternative (research) hypothesis
Hazard ratioA ratio of hazard rates (used in survival analysis)
HeterogeneityVariation in results across studies or groups
HistogramA bar chart of frequency for continuous data (bars touch)
H-indexAn author-level metric: h papers each cited at least h times
Human subjectsPeople participating in research (or their identifiable data)
HypothesisA testable statement about the relationship between variables
Inclusion criteriaCharacteristics required for a participant to join a study
Informed consentVoluntary agreement after understanding purpose, risks, benefit
InstrumentA tool for measuring or observing a variable
InstrumentationThe process or tools used to collect/measure data
IntegrityHonesty and truthfulness in researching and reporting
Inter-rater reliabilityAgreement between two or more raters (κ, ICC, %)
Internal consistencyHow well items of a scale hang together (Cronbach's α)
Internal validityConfidence that the observed effect is a true causal effect
InterpretivismEpistemology that meaning is interpreted, not measured objectively
Intention-to-treatAnalysis including all randomised participants in original groups
Interquartile rangeThe middle 50% of data (Q3 − Q1); robust spread measure
InterventionThe treatment or exposure under study
InterviewA data-collection method using open-ended questions
Kappa (κ)Statistic for agreement beyond chance between raters
KeywordA term indexing/searching literature
Literature reviewA systematic survey of published work on a topic
MeanThe arithmetic average; sensitive to outliers
MeasurementAssigning numbers or labels to attributes by defined rules
MedianThe middle value of ordered data; robust to outliers
MethodA planned way of addressing a research question
ModeThe most frequently occurring value
ModelAn idealised description of how data were generated
Multiple imputationCreating several datasets by imputing missing values
Nominal scaleCategorical labels with no order (e.g., blood type)
Normal distributionA symmetric bell-shaped distribution (mean, SD)
Null hypothesisThe "no effect" statement tested against the data
Observational studyA study observing exposure/outcome without assigning treatment
Odds ratioRatio of the odds of an event in two groups
Operational definitionA precise, concrete procedure defining how a variable is measured
OutlierA value far from the rest; may be error or a true extreme
p-valueProbability of the data (or more extreme) if the null hypothesis is true
ParameterA numerical characteristic of a population
Pearson correlationA coefficient (r) ranging −1 to +1 for linear association
Pilot studyA small run of the method to refine procedures before the main study
PlagiarismUsing others' words or ideas without credit
PopulationThe entire group about which you want to generalise
PowerThe probability of detecting a true effect (1 − β)
Pre-registrationPublicly registering the analysis plan before collecting data
PrecisionCloseness of repeated estimates (low variance means high precision)
Primary dataData collected firsthand for the current study
Primary sourceThe original report of an event or study
ProbabilityA number between 0 and 1 quantifying uncertainty
Propensity scoreEstimated probability of treatment, used to balance confounders
ProtocolA written plan for a study
Publication biasTendency to publish significant results more readily
QuantitativeData expressed numerically, amenable to statistical analysis
QuartileA value dividing ranked data into four equal groups
RandomisationAssigning units to groups by a chance mechanism
RangeThe difference between the largest and smallest values
Relative risk(Risk ratio) ratio of risk in exposed vs unexposed groups
ReliabilityConsistency of a measure across time, items, or raters
ReplicationRepeating a study to check whether findings hold
ReproducibilityWhether the same analysis on the same data gives the same result
ResidualThe difference between an observed and a predicted value
Risk of biasThe risk that errors influenced a study's results
SamplingSelecting a subset of the population
Sampling biasSystematic error from how participants are selected
Sampling distributionThe probability distribution of a statistic over all samples
Sampling errorNatural variability between a sample statistic and the population
Sampling frameA list used for sampling (should match the population)
ScaleAny measuring instrument; also a scale of measurement (NOIR)
Scatter plotA plot of paired observations to show a relationship
Secondary sourceA source interpreting or summarising primary sources
Significance levelThe threshold α for rejecting H₀ (usually 0.05)
SkewAsymmetry of a distribution (positive or negative)
Snowball samplingA chain-referral method for hidden populations
Standard deviationThe average distance of values from the mean
Standard errorThe standard deviation of a sampling distribution
Statistical significanceA result unlikely to be due to chance (small p-value)
StatisticA number describing a sample characteristic
StratumA subgroup used in stratified sampling (plural strata)
Systematic reviewA rigorous, protocol-driven literature review
T-distributionThe bell-shaped distribution used for small-sample inference
t-testA test comparing means (one-sample, paired, or two-sample)
Test-retest reliabilityWhether a measure gives the same result when repeated
TriangulationUsing multiple methods/data sources to study one question
Type I errorRejecting a true null hypothesis (a false positive)
Type II errorFailing to reject a false null hypothesis (a false negative)
UncertaintyThe inherent unknownness in observations and estimates
VariableA characteristic that can take different values
VarianceThe average squared deviation from the mean
Visual analogue scaleA line respondents mark to rate an attribute (e.g., pain)

Built from Markdown with VitePress.