Module 9: Creativity, Literature Review, and Technical Communication

← Previous: Module 8 · Subject index · Next: Module 10 →

Learning outcomes

After this module, you should be able to:

• apply creativity techniques to generate research ideas;
• conduct and structure a literature review;
• avoid plagiarism and reference correctly;
• write a research paper, thesis/report, and proposal;
• present research effectively;
• use LaTeX for documentation;
• understand IPR basics and protect innovations.

Prerequisites

Complete Module 8 first. Review its quick-revision section if any term below feels unfamiliar.

Study blocks

Study one block at a time. Work through its example and checkpoint before continuing.

Block	Topic	Suggested time
1	Start here: the simple idea	10-15 minutes
2	Creativity and innovation in research	10-15 minutes
3	Literature review techniques	10-15 minutes
4	Plagiarism, citation styles, and referencing tools	10-15 minutes
5	Technical writing: papers, theses, reports	10-15 minutes
6	Research presentation and conference skills	10-15 minutes
7	Basics of LaTeX for research documentation	10-15 minutes
8	Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)	10-15 minutes
9	Case studies in high-impact research papers	10-15 minutes

Start here: the simple idea

Great research needs two minds: the creative mind that asks new questions and finds new connections, and the scholarly mind that records, cites, and shares findings honestly. This module is about training both.

Analogy

Creativity = the prospector finding a new gold vein; literature review = surveying the mine to see where others dug; writing/presenting = showing the vein clearly and honestly; IPR = staking your claim so others pay you respect (or royalties).

Creativity and innovation in research

Wallas' model of creativity

1. Preparation: gather information on the problem.
2. Incubation: step away; let the subconscious work.
3. Illumination: the "aha!" insight.
4. Verification: test and refine the insight.

Techniques to boost creativity

• Brainstorming: quantity first, judgment later.
• SCAMPER: Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put to other uses/Eliminate/Reverse.
• Six Thinking Hats: view the problem from different "lenses."
• Analogies / cross-domain transfer: map ideas from another field.
• Reversal / inversion: ask "what would make this fail?"
• Random stimulus: link a random word to the problem.

Innovation in research: the SC framework

• Science (S): understand (new theory/knowledge).
• Creation (C): apply/invent (new artefact/method).

For our stress study

Idea: combine exercise with peer accountability (a social spin on an existing intervention) → novel twist worth testing.

Literature review techniques

Part 1 — planning and searching

1. Define keywords from your question (PICO: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome).
2. Choose databases (Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Scopus).
3. Set inclusion/exclusion criteria (years, study type, language).
4. Snowball/gray-literature search (follow citations backward/forward).

Part 2 — organising and synthesising

• Chronological: how ideas developed over time.
• Thematic: group by concepts/themes.
• Methodological: group by techniques used.
• Theoretical: group by theory/framework.

Synthesise, don't just list. Use a table:

Author (year)	Approach	Key finding	Limitation

Literature matrix

Organise by theme → evidence → gap → your question. End the review by stating the gap your research fills.

Plagiarism, citation styles, and referencing tools

Plagiarism = presenting others' work as your own

Kinds: copy-paste, paraphrase without credit, self-plagiarism, idea theft.

Citation styles

• APA: author-date (used in social/behavioural sciences).
• IEEE: numbered brackets [1] (engineering/CS).
• ACM: numbered (computing).
• Chicago: notes-bibliography OR author-date.

Referencing tools

• Reference managers: Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote.
• LaTeX: BibTeX/biblatex with a .bib file.

Always cite: direct quote, paraphrase, data, figures, ideas, methods.

Technical writing: papers, theses, reports

IMRaD structure (papers)

• Introduction — problem, gap, question, objectives.
• Methods — design, data, analysis plan (reproducible).
• Results — what you found (no interpretation).
• And Discussion — interpret, limitations, implications.

Thesis/report structure

Title, abstract, acknowledgements, table of contents, list of figures/tables, introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, references, appendices.

Writing tips

• Use active voice and present tense for known facts; past tense for your results.
• One idea per paragraph; topic sentence + evidence + link.
• Write clearly to a non-expert reviewer: define acronyms, justify choices.

CS research proposal (4-part plan used in the syllabus)

1. Part 1.1–1.2: introduce the problem and motivate the research question.
2. Part 2: literature review — the gap you will fill.
3. Part 3: proposed approach/methodology (design, experiments, evaluation).
4. Part 4: expected contribution, timeline (Gantt), and risks.

Research presentation and conference skills

• Abstract/first slide: the one-sentence answer to "why does this matter?"
• Story arc: problem → gap → method → result → takeaway.
• Visuals: one message per slide; label axes; size fonts ≥24 pt.
• Time management: rehearse to the limit; build a buffer.
• Q&A: listen fully, answer the question asked, admit if you don't know.

Basics of LaTeX for research documentation

LaTeX separates content from formatting:

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{graphicx, amssymb}
\begin{document}
\begin{figure}[h]
  \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{stress-plot}
  \caption{Stress scores declined (p<0.05).}
\end{figure}
$$ t = \frac{\bar x - \mu_0}{s/\sqrt{n}}, \quad df = n-1 $$
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\bibliography{myrefs}
\end{document}

Why use it: consistent formatting, superb maths, automatic references, templates for journals/conferences.

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)

Type	Protects	Duration	Example
Patent	Invention/functional innovation	~20 years	A new sorting algorithm implemented in hardware
Copyright	Literary/artistic works	life + 50–70 yrs	Your paper, code, slides
Trademark	Brand names/logos	renewable (10 yr)	Product names
Trade secret	Secret know-how	as long as secret	Formula, process

For research: publish to claim priority; file a patent before public disclosure if it's an invention; never include proprietary code/images without permission; cite third-party material.

Case studies in high-impact research papers

1. Page, Rabin: "Machine Learning in Static Analysis" (SAS) — tight problem framing, reproducible benchmarks, clear ablation.
2. Vaswani et al.: "Attention Is All You Need" — clear motivation, simple figures, reproducible results, open source.
3. A classic medical RCT — pre-registered design, CONSORT checklist, effect size + CI.

Common success factors: a well-defined question, open/reproducible code, honest limitations, clear figures.

PDF-aligned additions

Literature-review workflow

Define search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria, search reliable databases, screen titles and abstracts, read eligible sources, extract comparable evidence, evaluate quality, and synthesize themes or gaps. A literature review is a critical synthesis, not a list of summaries.

Academic integrity and IPR

Plagiarism includes unattributed copying, close paraphrase without attribution, and presenting another person's idea or data as one's own. Cite sources while drafting and keep a source record. Patents protect qualifying inventions; copyright protects original expression; trademarks distinguish goods or services. Check ownership and disclosure rules before publishing software, datasets, or inventions.

Common mistakes

• Writing the literature review as a summary list (must synthesise to a gap).
• Citing so many sources that the reader can't tell which is yours.
• Claiming priority for ideas you didn't originate (or fail to cite prior art).
• Submitting to a journal whose scope doesn't match (desk-reject).
• Using one slide for three results (cognitive overload).

Memory rules

• Creativity stages: Prep → Incubate → Illume → Verify.
• Literature review ends with the gap your work fills.
• IMRaD for papers; numbered cites in IEEE/ACM, author-date in APA.
• LaTeX for maths/plots/references; cite everything third-party.
• IPR: patent (invention) / copyright (writing) / trademark (brand) / trade secret.

Check your understanding

1. In SCAMPER, what does "A" stand for?
2. What must a literature review end with?
3. Which citation style uses "[1]" numbers?
4. Name one reason to use LaTeX over Word for a CS paper.

Answers

Reveal answers after attempting the questions

1. Adapt.
2. A clear statement of the gap the current research will fill.
3. IEEE (and ACM).
4. E.g., superior maths typesetting, automatic reference management, journal templates, reproducibility.

Quick revision box

• Creativity: Wallas (prep/incubate/aha/verify); techniques (SCAMPER, brainstorming, analogies).
• Literature review: plan search (keywords/DBs/criteria) → synthesise (thematic/chronological) → gap → your question.
• Plagiarism = uncredited reuse; cite quotes, ideas, data, figures.
• Papers = IMRaD; proposals = problem/lit/approach/contribution+timeline.
• LaTeX: content/formatting separate; great for maths, refs, templates.
• IPR: patent (invention, ~20y), copyright (writing, long), trademark (brand), trade secret (indefinite).

Exam guidance

Define the method, justify why it fits the research question, apply it to the running study, and mention one limitation or ethical consideration.

Practice ladder

1. Easy - Recall: Define the module's central idea in one or two sentences.
2. Easy - Recognize: Identify the correct method for a small example and explain why it fits.
3. Medium - Apply: Work through one representative problem without copying the example.
4. Medium - Compare: Contrast two methods or concepts from the module.
5. Hard - Integrate: Solve a university-style scenario and justify every major step.

Reveal self-evaluation guide

A complete response uses correct terminology, shows intermediate steps, connects the result to the scenario, and states one assumption or limitation.

---

← Previous: Module 8 · Subject index · Next: Module 10 →